On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:01:13AM -0800, TS Glassey wrote:
> Yeah and like the other DNSSEC I-D's I dfound numerous things in it that
> would violate the controls put in place by US Patent 6,370,629 of which I
> am one of the two owners and controlling parties to that IP.
Please start litigating. I've looked at this patent and the other one you
mentioned in the context of DNSSEC, and based on earlier discussions with a
patent attorney, your claims don't look like they would stand up at least in
Dutch courts.
draft-dickinson-dnsop-nameserver-control does not even mention a
geographical location, nor does it mention anything that is time controlled.
If I recall correctly, making bogus IPR claims is a punishable offense at
least in Germany - SCO suffered that fate.
So either litigate or refrain from intimidating us.
Bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
