At 23:10 +1000 6/11/08, Mark Nottingham wrote: >While this thread isn't necessarily off-topic for ietf-http-wg list, >it's more relevant IMO to dnsop, and cross-posted high-volume >discussions tend to be distracting. > >So, please try to move discussion onto the dnsop list (I've set Reply- >To accordingly).
Odd to see this, I was about to say "what does this have to do with DNS operations?" and suggest that it move back to the HTTP group. Cookies aren't part of the DNS protocol. Is the issue that a cookie needs to state for what domains it is valid? Are you trying to relate domain names to a registrant? That's not a DNS issue, that's a WhoIs/IRIS issue, if you want to pin that into a protocol. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar Never confuse activity with progress. Activity pays more. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
