On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or sign the root and use aggressive negative caching (which is currently > prohibited by the RFCs, I'm told). Think extra zone :) > I agree that information leakage is a problem. Curiously enough, no > root server or TLD operators that I know of has published some sort of > privacy statement that underlines how they deal with this issue. They are not the ones generating this traffic. Its users as they cross over dns zones. i.e. travelers from china staying at a hotel in the USA who can't access their language script idn national china tlds via the legacy IANA root. > It's > also the reason why I think that AS112 for TLDs will not fly. It will. Makes the perfect dns equivalent of the bin bucket trash can. However the question remains - does it help the user in the end. Would it be more appropriate in my example above that the legacy root simply recognize Chinese national tlds? That would get rid of some of the error traffic of the root and do a service to travelers from china. Think users - not roots. cheers joe baptista
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
