I agree almost completely (and that "almost" is only there to cover me
in case I think of an objection later) with what Bill Manning said.
But I'm particularly concerned about this:

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 08:46:21AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:

> A self-correcting problem.  The folks that are affected are the ones  
> using the non-updated server and no one else. 

The problem is that those folks are _exactly_ the people who don't
understand any of this Internet plumbing anyway.  All they know is,
"This thing isn't working," or, "The Internet is down," or something
similar.  The idea that they're going to put pressure on someone to
fix it entails a great deal of optimism about what naive users might
know about how the Internet functions and who can solve their
problems.  

I think I should have put this another way than "cure worse than the
disease."  I agree that having lots of dispersed copies of the root
with at best very loosely coupled management of those copies would
solve the disease we have.  But this seems to me like solving the
problem of yellow fever by completely draining all the swamplands of
the world: it may be great for the humans, but it's pretty lousy if
you're one of the animals that lives in the swamp.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to