* Joe Abley: > The trouble with the AS112 project is that there's no actual connected > customer, and explaining that AS112 is special to transit providers > who haven't already heard of the concept can be a draining and > frequently unfulfilling exercise. I seem to think there's no actual > legal entity that carries the name "Root Server Technical Operations > Assn", and similarly no listed officers, letterhead, etc which makes > any LOA likely to be an exercise in photoshoppery and subterfuge.
Even if there were a blanket LOA letter, the issue still remains if *everyone* who can technically annoucne a prefix in the global table is entitled to run a global AS112 instance if they feel the urge to do so. I suppose the answer is "no", and you're back to square one. (The same issue arises with 6to4 and the 192.88.99.0/24 prefix, BTW.) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
