I think if these go in now, we'd need to push back 2.86 for a week or two for testing.
I've been through them and not found any show-stoppers, so I'm in a quandary about delaying 2.86 or pushing them to 2.87. Dominik, you were the one pushing for 2.86. Thoughts? Simon. On 03/09/2021 22:47, Petr Menšík wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I have prepared a set of patches applied over 2.86rc3 release. They were > made to silent some of reports from Coverity scans we do for our > packages. I did include reported parts in commit messages, so commit > messages are somehow noisy and contain more bytes that the diffs itself. > > It should add few safety checks on multiple places. Fix few error paths > not releasing allocated memory and retries in case of failed syscall. It > is not perfect, but should be good enough. > > Not heavily tested, compiles without issues or warnings and reduced > reported issues. Review would be appreciated. > > What do you think, can they still be merged? > > Cheers, > > Petr > > On 8/25/21 3:46 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: >> I just pushed a few final changes, tagged as dnsmasq-2.86rc1. >> >> I'm fairly confident that this can be released as 2.86 in the near >> future, but if you can, please test it now, to avoid disappointment later. >> >> https://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/release-candidates/dnsmasq-2.86rc1.tar.gz >> >> Cheers, >> >> Simon. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list >> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk >> https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list >> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk >> https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
