Ahh thanks! That's really useful. On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 at 00:15, john doe <johndoe65...@mail.com> wrote: > > On 8/25/2021 4:45 PM, Tom Yan wrote: > >> > >> > > >>> P.S. Btw it's sad that there's not something like `no-dns-interface`... > >> > >> > >> From a POV of completeness, or would it actually be useful? > > > > Well it could be a bit problematic / annoying when one wants to use > > dnsmasq for dhcp only, but I guess in most cases everyone just copes > > with it in one way or another. > > > > From (1): > > "Listen on <port> instead of the standard DNS port (53). Setting this to > zero completely disables DNS function, leaving only DHCP and/or TFTP." > > 1) https://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/docs/dnsmasq-man.html > > -- > John Doe > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
