On 24/01/2021 22:12, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 24/01/2021 11:38, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Am 23.01.21 um 02:34 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck: >>>> On Jan 22, 2021, at 4:33 PM, Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>> Apolgies about your wasted time. Once more with 2.84test3 ? >>> Thanks Simon, 2.84test3 solves all "failed to send packet" logs in my >>> testing ... >>> -- >>> Jan 22 18:44:22 gw-lan daemon.info dnsmasq[3297]: started, version >>> 2.84test3 cachesize 4096 >>> Jan 22 18:44:22 gw-lan daemon.info dnsmasq[3297]: compile time options: >>> IPv6 GNU-getopt no-DBus no-UBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP >>> no-conntrack ipset auth no-nettlehash no-DNSSEC loop-detect inotify >>> no-dumpfile >> >> So, I've updated FreeBSD's "head" branch to 2.83_1 which is essentially >> 2.84test3 (I just took the four patches from Git for now). >> >> Simon, what's on the roadmap next, do we have an estimated schedule yet, >> or are there more regressions you are working on? >> > > There are no more regressions known. > > I've just tagged 2.84rc1, from 2.83 this has commits as follows: > > 1) The three commits it took to fix the DNS regression. > 2) A couple of tidying/optimisation to the new 2.83 security fixes that > were held back in the interests of keeping patchsets small for backporters. > 3) Some administrivia. > 4) Vladislav's HAVE_NETTLEHASH->HAVECRYPTOHASH change, but modified for > backward compatibilty with HAVE_NETTLEHASH. > > > I'm pretty confident of all of these, so unless I hear of a reason not > to, I intend to release this as 2.84 in 24 hours. > >
Update. It's always good to look again at new code. 2.84rc2 is there now. > Cheers, > > Simon. > _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
