On 24/01/2021 11:38, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 23.01.21 um 02:34 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck: >>> On Jan 22, 2021, at 4:33 PM, Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: >>> >>> Apolgies about your wasted time. Once more with 2.84test3 ? >> Thanks Simon, 2.84test3 solves all "failed to send packet" logs in my >> testing ... >> -- >> Jan 22 18:44:22 gw-lan daemon.info dnsmasq[3297]: started, version 2.84test3 >> cachesize 4096 >> Jan 22 18:44:22 gw-lan daemon.info dnsmasq[3297]: compile time options: IPv6 >> GNU-getopt no-DBus no-UBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP >> no-conntrack ipset auth no-nettlehash no-DNSSEC loop-detect inotify >> no-dumpfile > > So, I've updated FreeBSD's "head" branch to 2.83_1 which is essentially > 2.84test3 (I just took the four patches from Git for now). > > Simon, what's on the roadmap next, do we have an estimated schedule yet, > or are there more regressions you are working on? >
There are no more regressions known. I've just tagged 2.84rc1, from 2.83 this has commits as follows: 1) The three commits it took to fix the DNS regression. 2) A couple of tidying/optimisation to the new 2.83 security fixes that were held back in the interests of keeping patchsets small for backporters. 3) Some administrivia. 4) Vladislav's HAVE_NETTLEHASH->HAVECRYPTOHASH change, but modified for backward compatibilty with HAVE_NETTLEHASH. I'm pretty confident of all of these, so unless I hear of a reason not to, I intend to release this as 2.84 in 24 hours. Cheers, Simon. _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
