Hello, > How is your patch better? Maybe because it avoids the command-line > server even if it is fastest, unless the others are down? I can see that > would be useful sometimes.
I would not say better, but you summed it up almost perfectly. So back to my original point of contention,is it worthy of being included in dnsmasq ?? Also, thank you for dnsmasq. Regards, Harish Badrinath
