> Hello, > > Marcus Better wrote: >> Yes, it works if I remove the other address. >> >> As a temporary fix, is it possible to force dnsmasq to answer requests? > > Your compiled binary probably lacks RTNETLINK support > (check with strings /usr/sbin/dnsmasq |grep netlink_init). > On OpenWRT something like the following patch is necessary. > Than 2.25test3 works as expected in regard to multiple networks/ranges > on one physical interface now, thanks Simon.
That's good > I don't know if RTNETLINK support in UCLIBC has to be differenciated > somehow, though. Please fix that in config.h appropriately. since 2.23 (i think, certianly 2.24) RTNETLINK should be enabled when compiled against uclibc > > (Ask if you have use for dnsmasq_2.25test3-2_mipsel.ipk.) > > Lutz > > --- dnsmasq-2.25test3.orig/src/config.h 2005-12-31 15:47:57.000000000 > +0200 > +++ dnsmasq-2.25test3/src/config.h 2005-12-31 15:47:57.000000000 +0200 > @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ > # else > # undef HAVE_GETOPT_LONG > # endif > +#define HAVE_RTNETLINK > #undef HAVE_ARC4RANDOM > #define HAVE_RANDOM > #define HAVE_DEV_URANDOM > That doesn't look like a patch against vanilla 2.25test3 src/config.h There's a block above there which is #if defined(__UCLIBC__) and which does enable RTNETLINK. Maybe you could send me the complete file, or a complete diff against the vanilla distribution; it's possible the the openWRT patches are confusing things. Cheers, Simon.
