> On 16 Dec 2021, at 10:10, Hank Nussbacher <h...@efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: > > On 16/12/2021 10:07, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 08:59:42AM +0100, >> Moritz Müller via dns-wg >> <dns-wg@ripe.net> >> wrote >> a message of 179 lines which said: >> >> >>> I was wondering: Why does the EC believe that the resolvers users >>> currently rely on (e.g. provided by their ISP) provide >>> “low-quality”? Are there any studies about this? >>> >> One possible response is that the people who write these statements >> don't know what they are talking about. But of course, I cannot >> believe that. So, another possible response: in Brussels, they see >> that some users move away from the IAP resolver to a public resolver, >> so there is probably a reason for that. (Unfortunately, DNS4EU may not >> address this reason.) >> >> > Or simply some politician traveled to Canada and said to his aide "Why can't > we do that as well?" > https://www.cira.ca/cybersecurity-services/canadian-shield
My sense is that discussions around DoH in recent years have given new prominence to this particular element in the DNS*, and as Hank notes, newly interested policymakers don’t have to look far to find examples of other, more state-defined/endorsed approaches. But the expected CfP may provide some more clarity on exactly how the Commission sees this evolving. Chris * The ongoing Quad9 legal developments in Germany may have also kept the issue front of mind… https://www.quad9.net/news/press/german-court-rules-against/
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-wg
