On Aug 1, 2023, at 16:37, Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net> wrote: > > > As document shepherd... > >> Paul Wouters pointed out on the list (2023-07-02) that Appendix A is not in >> the format from RFC 7942, and is not at all definitive, and thus can be >> removed. > > I got the sense that the WG wanted the list of implementations to remain to > facilitate testing. If that is not the case, I can update the shepherd's > writeup to remove the offending request to retain the list.
I didn’t see a good reason to go against the advice of 7942 to remove it. If we had published a list of dns software supporting DoH in a document in 2018, how useful or misleading would that list be at this point? I again recommend to let the RFC editor remove the list before publication. Paul _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
