Simon Lyall wrote: > On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Doug Barton wrote: >> We of the DNS literati tend to forget just how difficult this stuff >> really is, and how hard it is for companies to prioritize spending >> money on things that usually "just work." > > I'm a little concerned at the answers here.
even https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2013-October/010765.html ? > Surely a recursive resolver is one of the simplest services in the > world to configure? You basically enable it, make sure recursion is > on[1] and update DHCP or whatever to use it. Add another server for > luck and put a "Turning this off breaks Internet" sticker on it if you > want it robust. +1. for opendns to have 20M+ unique ip's per day using their service, the general presumption has to be that rdns is hard, which is to say, the general presumption is as usual wrong. > > I'm not entirely sold on using Google DNS or OpenDNS. In my case there > are/were several thousand km and and few counties away so didn't > produce the best performance, they also introduce a dependence on > upstream services several hops away. as i said, https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2013-October/010765.html . vixie _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
