Unless the company's line of business makes running a recursive server a "core competency:"
+1, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_advantage for a basis for my reasoning. Did the company build their offices, manufacture their furniture, pave and reseal their parking lot? (I ask rhetorically/sarcastically.) On Oct 14, 2013, at 19:54, Jared Mauch wrote: > I'll say no. They don't have resources to deal with 98 angry users when DNS > fails. Using OpenDNS or the ISP is likely the best choice. Most large ISP dns > servers are good. > > Jared Mauch > >> On Oct 14, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: >> >> A fictitious 100-person company has an IT staff of 2 who have average IT >> talents. They run some local servers, and they have adequate connectivity >> for the company's offices through an average large ISP. >> >> Should that company run its own recursive resolver for its employees, or >> should it continue to rely on its ISP? >> >> --Paul Hoffman >> _______________________________________________ >> dns-operations mailing list >> dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net >> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations >> dns-jobs mailing list >> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > dns-jobs mailing list > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468 There are no answers - just tradeoffs, decisions, and responses.
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
