On 5/15/2012 5:03 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > ... This kind of worry (and I want to emphasise I don't share it; I'm > just pointing out that people who like to worry about this sort of > thing have an argument) could be addressed by various server operators > providing outlines of how they select sites, what their provisioning > assumptions are, and so on.
none of the rootops puts our terms of service on the root-servers.org web site, because it might look like advertising. but anyone from isc is happy to talk about it; for example i can say right here right now that we go where we're wanted: we rely on local sponsors. we prefer internet exchanges but we've done some inside-ISP f-root installs when there either isn't a local IX or the ISP is huge. we like to control our own BGP, so the inside-ISP installs will usually not be offered to that ISP's peers or transits, only to their customers. other rootops have their own wonderfully diverse criteria; that's a feature. paul -- "I suspect I'm not known as a font of optimism." (VJS, 2012) _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
