Hi, Martin Steigerwald writes:
> Hi! > > You cannot make this up, can you? > > Bug 2119518 - GNOME being OOM killed during basic use on VM with 2G of > RAM > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119518 Reading through the bug report it looks a lot like someone got their maths wrong. I mean using a few billion % of memory and uptimes well over two centuries ... > It still seems to be that people think adding complexity comes without > risk of malfunction. > > oomd may make sense in certain cloud based workloads, maybe, just maybe. > However… on a desktop? You are frigging kidding me, aren't you? Just ran `apt search oomd` on a Daedalus machine. It's there alright, both oomd and systemd-oomd. Both are installable (based on an `apt install --dry-run` of either) but nothing seems to reverse depend on it. BTW, systemd-oomd does not depend on oomd ... > Thank you for Devuan! Thank you for some sanity. > > And yeah, it appears that with Debian oomd is not installed as standard > so far, but if its in Fedora, it may come with Debian at some point in > time. Or not, after their recent experiences in Fedora :) Maybe people > can still learn. -- Olaf Meeuwissen _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
