On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 12:11:46AM +0200, Harald Arnesen via Dng wrote: > Haines Brown [07.08.2020 18:19]: > > > Yes, for sure. If you are right about the speed difference between > > NTFS and ext4, then is there another FS that can be accessed by a > > Windows machine that is not much slower than ext4? > > fat32. Or if you run a recent kernel on your Linux machine (Devuan 5.4 > is ok), then exfat. > -- > Hilsen Harald
Hilsen, going to fat32 might be my bset bet if its speed is more like ext4 than ntfs. Is it the consensus that this is the case? -- Haines Brown _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
