Seriously, this DMARC thing, or at least the way it's implemented on DNG, is downright dangerous. I accidentally replied onlist to yet another, as I was researching this.
Did you know that for some but not all DNG email, "reply to sender" sends it to the list? That's just plain dangerous and shouldn't happen in any circumstance. One day somebody's going to say something very personal in what he/she thinks is a private message, only to have it go to the entire list. Let me repeat: "Reply to sender" should never, ever go to the list. Having it that way is a flame war or worse waiting to happen. Perhaps my three or four slipups (and I think under the circumstances they could be forgiven) serve as a warning of what *could* happen if really sensitive stuff went to the list instead of a person. I beg whomever is in charge of the DNG mailing list to fix whatever's wrong with the DMARC implementation. This is a very dangerous situation. SteveT Steve Litt December 2019 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century http://www.troubleshooters.com/rl21 _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
