On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 03:17:58 +1100, Andrew wrote in message <c5fc27fa-d0a4-c3e8-f1e4-684b08c6a...@affinityvision.com.au>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Jo. > > On 23/11/19 12:26 am, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote: > > In the worst case we would not be able to rely on MX Linux? > > I think not. > > MX is not exactly against systemd, they use it still, but not as the > init system. And MX is reliant upon Debian anyway.... so sad that > Debian is being destroyed by systemd. I don't know what the answer > is, but it would have been best if the original TC chose against > systemd, but that ship has sailed and the damage is well and truly > done and it's only getting worse. > > I prefer Devuan over MX, but at this time I am using MX on a machine > as an interim until my machine is properly supported by Devuan (if > that ever happens properly). ..what's missing? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
