On 11/09/2018 14:55, Steve Litt wrote: > As far as fixing Lurker, why not use a different archive machine? Even > when Lurker works, I find using its representation of email history > almost inscrutable. Every other Mailman-run mailing list has a nice, > easy archive, although they usually aren't searchable. But then again, > neither is Lurker. > > LOL, a part of me wants to make a new archive representer (assuming the > messages are stored in maildir), but I just don't have the time.
Take a look at Postorius and HyperKitty, the new web UI archiver for Mailman3. According to the HyperKitty docs at https://hyperkitty.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ this is a demo system: https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Mark Rousell
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
