I have Virtualbox working on freebsd. On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:52 AM, J. Fahrner <j...@fahrner.name> wrote:
> Am 2018-03-14 21:29, schrieb Chillfan: > >> Just as a precursor to this.. I don't consider freebsd an alternative >> to Devuan partly because of freedom related issues since they're happy >> to accept binary only drivers there. >> > > I have no problem with binary drivers. I am not an ideologist. I like the > concept that Kernel and User Land are of one piece. Everything centrally > coordinated, no wild growth as under Linux. Of course, they adapt many > things from the Linux world, because otherwise many software just would not > run. Basically, I think BSD is much better. In real operation, however, > there are 2 problems: many laptop functions are still immature, e.g. > Suspend / Resume, and the software offering is even worse than under Linux. > For example, there is no Virtualbox or VMware Player, which is important to > me for a few Windows programs that do not exist for Linux. > > Jochen > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
