On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:21:18 +0100, KatolaZ wrote in message <20170918092118.gh23...@katolaz.homeunix.net>:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:29:35AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > [cut] > > > > > > > I haven't replied for a while. but yeah your probably right. > > > Devuan is better as is. I would definitely though that being > > > said, hope to make a not pure rolling release, but one with a > > > stability in the middle of stable and testing, and then one for > > > unstable and experimental... > > > > ..one early blunder we did, was fork off Debian Jessie rather than > > Debian Wheezy, a lot of good people we could have used here, got > > stuck there because they are conservative and slow because they > > get paid to prioritize stability. > > > > ..we could help bridge that "Debian-Wheezy-to-Devuan-Jessie" gap > > with a _minimal_ "Devuan Wheezy 0.x" fork, if that isn't too much > > water under the bridge now... > > > Dear Adrnt, > > there is no gap at all between Debian Wheezy and Devuan Jessie. You > can safely upgrade form Debian Wheezy to Devuan Jessie, as explained > also in the Jessie Release notes. This is probably the most relevant > link: > > > https://git.devuan.org/dev1fanboy/Upgrade-Install-Devuan/wikis/Upgrade-to-Devuan > > HND > > KatolaZ > ..excellent, we're getting there. :o) Now, can we get the mirror upgrade-to-Devuan as good? I have a partial Debian mirror we can use as a guinea pig. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
