On Mon, 30 May 2016 13:36:43 +0200, Jaromil wrote in message <20160530113643.GB32479@reflex>:
> On Sun, 29 May 2016, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > > we'd love to have a vdev package, but maintainance of it in > > > Devuan is not yet assigned. please note that vdev is made to run > > > also in parallel with udev and it should not disturb its > > > functioning, so testing should be fairly easy. > > > > ..eerie. Means systemd-udev can subvert vdev. > > why does it means that? I can't see any reason ..this far I'm only aware of political, military, monetary etc power/might reasons why these zealots would want to subvert us, but I dunno enough on the tech details on how, when and where they would do that to us. > why systemd-udev can > subvert vdev. I'd be surprised to say the least. ..then you are too damned naïve. BTDT, still bleeding. > I wrote that vdev is engineered to not clash with udev. > > > ..is there a non-systemd udev out there anywhere? > > yes... this has been extensively covered in docs and messages. ..I should have said "packaged into .debs ready for user tests?", and I need a new email server, I constantly hear of bounces, I'm still deep in post-Groklaw litigation. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
