On 2016-03-20 15:45, Didier Kryn wrote:
Le 20/03/2016 10:35, Daniel Reurich a écrit :
   I agree that there is little point in putting
effort into packaging something that isn't currently in a functional
state.  If you could share the details of your testing so people can
replicate and perhaps help with the development that would mean that
this discussion has not been useless, but instead useful in teasing out
details that at least I had previously missed.

Thank you for this vital update Didier;-)

I have sometimes difficulties to express things in an understandable way :-)

I expect Jude has tested his last version and I suspect he did it with
the files under /usr/local and it worked. On my side, I tested it
under the FHS but with a different OS and it failed. I dunno where the
error is. One possibility is that the problem is in the misplacement
of some file(s) or error in some config file.


What error, what happens or is it merely not working?
Did you check log-files?

Latest version works for me under Arch based OS although there are some
question marks for me regarding using vdev and devtmpfs together but I have open
issues on github for those.




Brief inventory of the files installed on my test bench:
/sbin/vdevd
/lib/vdev: 11 executable binaries and 27 scripts
/lib/vdev/hwdb: one script and a squashfs filesystem (maybe left over
from building)
/lib/vdev/hwdb/input: 14 text files
/etc/vdev/ifnames.conf
/etc/vdev/vdevd.conf
/etc/acls: 3 files
/etc/actions: 76 text files

    Not only must these more than 150 files be in the right places,
but also vdevd and the other executables must look for them in the
right places.

    BTW, any news from Jude?

    Didier

_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to