On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 08:44:37AM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * On 2016 26 Feb 17:16 -0600, Steve Litt wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:46:58 +0100 > > Florian Zieboll <f.zieb...@web.de> wrote: > > > > > > > IIUC, LXDE's decision to go Qt was based on the fact that it otherwise > > > and rather sooner than later would have to go GTK+ 3, which I see very > > > well in tune with the base motives of Devuan. May everybody think of > > > KDE what s/he likes (there's a reason that I chose LXDE...), but Qt is > > > not KDE. Devuan is hardly going to make it without confederates and I > > > would like a lot to see LXQt being one of them. > > > > So are you saying maybe we should make some acquaintances in the LXQt > > world? Sounds kindof cool. > > I'd like to give LxQt a whirl but see that they only have packages from > their 0.9 release available for Jessie.
And lxqy seems not to be a package in the devuan jessie repository. Should it be? -- hendrik > Perhaps 0.10 relies on a newer > Qt than supported by Jessie. I guess I could try building it locally > but that can be a pain for all the other things a desktop links to. > > I think Qt should have a brighter future for a universal toolkit since > it's available on the major platforms. It has good language bindings > and doesn't seem to be boxing itself into the corner of only existing > primarily to support a single desktop environment as GNOME seems to be > intending with GTK+3. > > - Nate > > -- > > "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all > possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." > > Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
