Hello GoLinux, Steve, and Hendrik! Good to see you all again, in spite of past disagreements.

This is just my opinion, but I don't see XFCE's future being so grim.

I think GTK's future outside of Gnome is the concern. It's been my observation that GTK has become very Gnome-centric, and a number of projects have abandoned it, in favor of other kits. There has been talk of GTK4, but that has been going around for a number of years now, with nothing final. Once Wayland replaces X11, we might actually have a concern over GTK2, but that has been dragging on for years also. GTK2 is going to maintained by RHEL for at least another 4 years, and probably by the community for far longer than 2020. It is about as mature as it is going to get. Given that, I don't think XFCE has any real danger of being rushed.

If XFCE actually moves to GTK3 as they planned, then I think it is good for them. If the devs strip out a few features, then I don't see it as a great loss, because of its dependence on GTK. In my opinion, it is better to lose a feature or two than leave them broken or unmaintained. As I see it, they will most certainly have to change a few things to accommodate GTK3. It is likely to retain the most used features. The current XFCE has a number of features, applets, etc that are poorly designed, buggy, or not well maintained anyway. If a few go away or receive some love, all the better.

The best thing to do if someone wanted to have a voice in it, is contributing to XFCE.


On another topic, LXDE has been replaced with LXQt. It's my feeling that LXQt is not quite ready to completely replace LXDE yet. Like XFCE, LXDE uses GTK. The developers abandoned work on LXDE in favor of LXQt, saying that that something akin to GTK3 being disappointing and that switching to Qt was preferable.


_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to