On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:44:43 -0700, Gregory wrote in message <20151225194443.ga2...@gregn.net>:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 02:35:39PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > > > (Why /mnt ?) > > > > Tradition. It exists on all distros I've ever seen, and it's used > > for mountpoints. Do you think the more modern, file > > manager-centric /media would be a better choice? That would be no > > more difficult. > > Here's another good reason: /mnt is quicker and easier to repeatedly > type than /media. I'd say mount as /mnt/sdd1, /mnt/sdd2, ... Just my > $0.01 worth. > > Greg ..where did the "/media tradition" come from anyway? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
