On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 02:35:39PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > > (Why /mnt ?) > > Tradition. It exists on all distros I've ever seen, and it's used for > mountpoints. Do you think the more modern, file manager-centric /media > would be a better choice? That would be no more difficult.
Here's another good reason: /mnt is quicker and easier to repeatedly type than /media. I'd say mount as /mnt/sdd1, /mnt/sdd2, ... Just my $0.01 worth. Greg -- web site: http://www.gregn.net gpg public key: http://www.gregn.net/pubkey.asc skype: gregn1 (authorization required, add me to your contacts list first) If we haven't been in touch before, e-mail me before adding me to your contacts. -- Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-mana...@eu.org _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
