Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> writes: > On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 02:20:41 +0200 > Laurent Bercot <ska-de...@skarnet.org> wrote: > >> On 29/08/2015 23:11, Steve Litt wrote: >> > in my LUG, the most pro-systemd guys are the mega-metal admins >> > administering hundreds of boxes with hundreds of Docker containers. >> > These guys are telling me systemd is necessary to efficiently manage >> > the Dockers. >> >> They're telling you that because they've been brainwashed with that >> idea, and since it's working for them, they're too lazy to try >> anything else. But they're wrong. Alpine Linux, for instance, makes >> Docker containers a breeze to use, and makes the images a lot smaller. >> Alpine is runit-based, and people have also found success running >> Docker containers under s6; systemd is very unnecessary, and anyone >> pretending it is is either ignorant or malicious. > > This is very good information.
Something else you might want to have a look at: http://www.ibuildthecloud.com/blog/2014/12/03/is-docker-fundamentally-flawed _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
