On 29/08/2015 23:11, Steve Litt wrote:
in my LUG, the most pro-systemd guys are the mega-metal admins administering hundreds of boxes with hundreds of Docker containers. These guys are telling me systemd is necessary to efficiently manage the Dockers.
They're telling you that because they've been brainwashed with that idea, and since it's working for them, they're too lazy to try anything else. But they're wrong. Alpine Linux, for instance, makes Docker containers a breeze to use, and makes the images a lot smaller. Alpine is runit-based, and people have also found success running Docker containers under s6; systemd is very unnecessary, and anyone pretending it is is either ignorant or malicious.
Yeah, whatever, give me the budget Redhat gave the systemd cabal, so I can hire good programmers, and I'll make it work efficiently without breaking Linux and entangling everything.
If you have 1/10 of that budget and are hiring, I'm available and willing to full-time this. ;) -- Laurent _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
