"T.J. Duchene" <t.j.duch...@gmail.com> writes: > If I might add my two cents a few days late, > > I really do not think that kdbus matters overly much and that people > (including myself in the past) have assigned too much concern to the topic. > Kdbus is little more than an implementation of dbus, which is a fairly > neutral > protocol. The concern of course is that kdbus might mean the use of > systemd.
With a horrible mix of things, "kdbus is RedHat's AppleTalk/ SunRPC" [for implementing highly-reliable systems distributed on a single laptop]. As to 'use of systemd', there are things which sound like they were to fear more seriously, ie, the stated intention of at least one kernel maintainer (Tejun Hejo, spelling probably wrong) that he wants to "break userspace" in order to turn cgroups "into a private property of systemd". The latter is something which (IMO) cannot technically be accomplished but if he actually so desires, he can surely make life very miserable for everyone else. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
