Hi, everyone! =)

With all this discussion about changes, I'd like to make sure that the UNIX 
guru/programmer is represented.  I've mentioned this before, and I hate 
repetition - BUT - I feel it is important enough that it should be stated 
separately so that it is not overlooked.  All this discussion about replacing 
defaults concerns me that someone might inadvertently break some standards that 
they are unfamiliar with.  Yes, before anyone says anything, I already know 
that Linux does not entirely comply with POSIX standards, and deliberately 
breaks it in places.  

I just do not want to see any "Linuxisms" and breakage compounded further.  
Systemd everywhere is bad enough.  When I say that, I am not saying that 
Systemd breaks POSIX.  It technically doesn't.  It does, however, break scripts 
on occasion; in spite of arguments by the systemd developers that does not.  
I'm hoping that Devuan does not make similar mistakes while moving in a 
different direction.

I do not think anyone cares WHAT the default changed to is as long as Devuan 
has vi and other "old school" tools installed by default to comply with the 
POSIX standard.  
 
Thanks and have a wonderful day!

T.J.

_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to