On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 02:06:26AM -0700, James Powell wrote: > Then this without a doubt is clear evidence that kdbus is in fact a systemd > proprietary IPC. Has anyone heard of any software otherwise that will use > kdbus at all, even in the least? > > Lennart is desperate to get kdbus in, but is making a critical error in > judgment with this. No distribution has ever added software to the kernel > that has been 3rd party via patch, or has limited function, other than Gentoo > that maintains a patch for OpenRC. ZFSOnLinux has never been allowed, neither > has Reiser4, or any other non-vanilla code, nor any code from Linux-next. > > No package developer in their right mind would do such a lascivious addition > to the kernel, nor would dare to. >
Yes, but no other software had ever managed to sweep sysvinit and invade all the existing distributions in less than two years, swallowing almost all the existing low-level OS services in a single hairball of code, before systemd arrived... Despite I trust kernel developers, I believe that the inclusion of kdbus in the kernel will be only a matter of time. I really hope I will be proven wrong this time, though. HND KatolaZ -- [ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ] [ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ] [ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ] _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
