On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2015, 12:29:57 schrieb Marlon Nunes: > > "The job of keeping kernel development moving isn't so much about > > "technical know-how" these days, he said. Running the core of arguably > > the world's most important operating system is now about "being trusted > > and being available. GREG (AKA GREG KROAH HARTMAN) IS THE OBVIOUS NUMBER > > TWO. HE COULD TAKE IT UP, and then there are a couple of other people."" > > Linus Torvalds > > > > Guy, that's the guy who wants by all means, kdbus in the kernel. That's > > the systemd guy in the linux kernel community. > > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/06/17/now_i_can_die_happy_what_linus_did > > nt_iquitei_say/ > > In the light of > > * kdbus support is no longer compile-time optional. It is now > always built-in. However, it can still be disabled at > runtime using the kdbus=0 kernel command line setting, and > that setting may be changed to default to off, by specifying > --disable-kdbus at build-time. Note though that the kernel > command line setting has no effect if the kdbus.ko kernel > module is not installed, in which case kdbus is (obviously) > also disabled. We encourage all downstream distributions to > begin testing kdbus by adding it to the kernel images in the > development distributions, and leaving kdbus support in > systemd enabled.
Does this mean that kdbus support is not compiled into Poeterring's kernel? Is this effectively a kernel fork? -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
