Hi, Just me being picky here.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Martijn Dekkers <devuan-li...@dekkers.org.uk> wrote: > The flip side is those that say "don't split the lists" - there again is no > significant cost to subscribing to both both lists, and follow and > participate in both lists if they so wish. It isn't so much a segregation of > a community, it is a segregation of topics - and a long standing, > wide-ranging implementation pattern in the wider open-source community at > that. Maybe i should say "self-segregation" instead. That's my beef, but as you correctly say, anyone can join any list (and leave it too). The «long standing, wide-ranging implementation pattern» thing is a bogus argument. Similar to "Lots of people jump of bridges, care to join them?" > This isn't the first call for separate lists, so there clearly is a (strong) > desire for this from some people. Just because some people called for it, doesn't mean they feel strongly about it. Again, just being picky. Oh, holy devs, i intentionally did not put [DEV] in the subject (a reasonable suggestion if i might add). _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
