On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Joerg Reisenweber - reisenwe...@web.de <devuan.kn.d76efe93d7.reisenweber#web...@ob.0sg.net> wrote: > Besides me for one not liking the idea to *get* *forced* to use btrfs for /,
The only way not to be forcing anybody is to stick with the least common denominator for everything. That flat out stops progress. > my link rather was referring to statements like >>The classic Linux > distribution scheme is frequently not what end users want, either. Many users > are used to app markets like Android, Windows or iOS/Mac have.<< As I said: I am not to excited about those apps either. I think sandboxing can be a security feature, but not while everything needs X11. Great software -- but only when you are safe to assume that everybody is nice to each other. We really need to get rid of that insecure crap! > I'm not playing around with concurrent distros either, I'm absolutely happy > with a single one that works and can get tailored to my needs by _me_ So am I, but I still like to be able to have different versions of my distro of choice. I do sometimes break things during an upgrade or during the tailoring:-) Maybe you are a better tailor than me, but I really enjoy the safety net. And yes, my systems are heavily tailored. How else would I be able to implement such a proposal? But you need to keep your eyes open for new ideas. And sometimes you find them in the most unexpected places:-) Best Regards, Karl _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
