On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 15:50:56 -0600 "T.J. Duchene" <t.j.duch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 23:38 -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > > > > > Bottom line is this: If you make a modular system with thin > > interfaces and sane components, somebody will make a block diagram > > representing it, accurately, in its entirety. [clip] > > Let's see the block diagram. Prove systemd doesn't have grave > > architectural problems. > > > > You misunderstand me, Steve. > > I have no problem with you or anyone else blasting systemd to your > heart's contentment. [clip] > What I am suggesting is that Devuan made the decision to step away > from Debian over the issue of systemd. My suggestion was that it is > best to just move on rather link Debian messages back here to restart > the debate. For all the time and energy put into the discussion, what > does anyone get out of it anyway? Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh! Thaaat's what you're saying. You were right, I certainly misunderstood you, I thought that you were arguing, on this list, that systemd really isn't that bad, and I argued against what I thought was your position. Reading this post, I agree with everything you say above (even the stuff I clipped). Yes! Removing systemd is settled law in Devuan land, and as such, it's kind of silly to revisit pro and anti-systemd arguments on this particular list. Makes perfect sense. SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
