On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 08:29:40 +0000 Michael Dec <grepw...@sucs.org> wrote:
> On 2015-02-02 17:47, T.J. Duchene wrote: > > Funny thing. I hear a lot of complaining about systemd, and yes, i > > think some of it is justified, but consider this...Rather than > > joining > > the project and steering it in another direction, or creating > > patches to fix what you do not like, everyone is just standing about > > complaining. Now this is not to say that Devuan is sitting on its > > hands. No one here, minus FreeBSD seems to me at least to have a > > clear action plan. You cant avoid systemd forever, and at some > > point compatibility is going to have to be provided. > > > > Better now than later. I think FreeBSD and uselessd have the best > > approaches. > > > > Just for the case of devels advocate (yes deliberate pun) systemd > > can be compiled with an absolute minimum. > OpenRC works just fine and it has all the rings and bells you would > want from systemd: > - logs (lol, welcome to 1980?) > - cgroups management > - parallel service start > > Interestingly, cgroups can be disabled and this is why this init runs > on BSD, these just don't exist there. > It really doesn't hurt to have a familiar software stack across > different operating systems. Time wasted on retraining is time you > could've used to do actual work. Especially if there's literally no > benefit to said retraining. Point of information: OpenRC itself cannot respawn or manage daemons. No problem, have managed daemons managed by daemontools or daemontools-encore, either of which can easily be started by OpenRC. LOL, this kind of easy solution is what you get when your tools do one thing and do it well :-) SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
