Yeah, there could be a "static-dev" package that satisfies the udev dependency but doesn't do anything with /dev.
Jude On Dec 26, 2014 5:12 PM, <k...@aspodata.se> wrote: > thiagocmarti...@gmail.com: > > I'm wondering here about what to do with `udev`, which is `systemd` in > > fact... > > > > What about this: > > > > 1- Rename current `udev` package to `systemd-udev`; > > > > 2- Add `vdev`; > > > > 3- Add `eudev`; > > > > 4- Add `mdev`; > > > > 4- Create a new Metapackage called `udev`, that will Depends on `eudev | > > vdev | mdev | systemd-udev`. > > I suggest: > > 5- root maintains /dev manually > > since a daemon for /dev isn't nessesary for a static system. > > Regards, > /Karl Hammar > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Aspö Data > Lilla Aspö 148 > S-742 94 Östhammar > Sweden > +46 173 140 57 > > > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
