'vening. On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 11:12:00PM +0100, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > thiagocmarti...@gmail.com: > > I'm wondering here about what to do with `udev`, which is `systemd` in > > fact... > > > > What about this: > > > > 1- Rename current `udev` package to `systemd-udev`; > > > > 2- Add `vdev`; > > > > 3- Add `eudev`; > > > > 4- Add `mdev`; > > > > 4- Create a new Metapackage called `udev`, that will Depends on `eudev | > > vdev | mdev | systemd-udev`. > > I suggest: > > 5- root maintains /dev manually > > since a daemon for /dev isn't nessesary for a static system. >
How good cases like raid hotswap and pendrives are dealt under this 5th bullet point? You've caught my attention, like "if a device node manager isn't really needed if you can mount new things under 9fs or via san", it would really astonish me. -- Teodoro Santoni _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
