Is it in the spirit of the Trump administration that we have to shut down so
hastily?
Methinks we might as well finish, that is (1); but note the draft is not a WG
draft any more.
Best
Ale
On Wed 19/Mar/2025 12:08:49 +0100 Barry Leiba wrote:
I note that we are shutting down the DMARC working group without completing the
failure reporting document. We have discussed what to do about failure
reporting,but never made a decision. We need to decide now.
I see three options:
1. Continue discussing the document, complete it, and ask Andy to AD-sponsor it.
2. Abandon the document, leave failure reporting as it had been, and refer
people to the old (Informational) DMARC spec for documentation of it.
3. Abandon the document and deprecate failure reporting. That would involve
mentioning failure reports, noting that they have been seldom used and
problematic, and stating that their use going forward is not recommended.
I recommend that we do (3), and call for objections to that path. If you agree
with (3), please note that here. If you prefer (1) or (2), please state that
and say why. If you see another reasonable option and prefer it, please
describe it.
Please post your opinion by the end of March.
I’ll note that options 2 and 3 require adjustments to the approved drafts, and
will need Andy’s review and approval for the changes.
Barry
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
