It appears that Douglas Foster <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Maybe the problem is that John has trademarked "weak" to mean "L=0", so I >will use "poorly constructed". ...
Sorry, no. Once again, you appear to have completely misunderstood my old double signing proposal. Nobody uses weak signatures, and even if they did. redesigning DKIM is stupendously out of scope for this WG. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
