It appears that Neil Anuskiewicz <[email protected]> said: > >> On Oct 30, 2022, at 11:09 AM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I believe it would go in a separate applicability statement if it were >> going to be in an IETF document. >> >> Scott K > >I think the ideas discussed around this topic shouldn’t be forgotten.
I completely disagree. DKIM works fine, and nobody uses or plans to use "weak" signatures. This whole discussion is due to someone completely misunderstanding a double signing proposal I made a long time ago. Weak signatures are not a thing. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
