In article <[email protected]> you write: >On Fri, Jun 26, 2020, at 9:44 PM, John Levine wrote: >> This makes me wonder how many mailing lists still don't add DKIM >> signatures. Unlike the header rewriting hacks, they don't affect the >> way recipients see or handle the mail in their inboxes. > >The HTTPbis list and Full Disclosure immediately come to mind. IIRC, >Bugtraq didn't use DKIM, either.
Bugtraq was started in 1993 and is now dead so I'm not sure how useful an example it is. Don't know which httpbis list but the IETF signs all its mail and if W3C doesn't, they use Exim which is easily adjusted to do so. The question isn't whether everyone signs, clearly some don't. The question is how much of an imposition it would be to ask them to do so. Unless they're using incredibly ancient mail and list software, not much. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
