This makes me wonder how many mailing lists still don't add DKIM
signatures. Unlike the header rewriting hacks, they don't affect the
way recipients see or handle the mail in their inboxes.
DKIM signing would certainly make it easier for receivers but I'm hesitant
to try and mandate it for intermediaries.
Well, gee, it's easier than ARC signing which is what we're asking now.
I am not opposed to asking list operators to make changes, so long as they
are not changes that force their users to change the long standing way
they use the lists. These days all of the MTAs and list managers I know
can do DKIM signing, so it's not a lot to ask.
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
