In article <[email protected]> you write: > I am aware that the DKIM specification says to treat an >unverifiable signature as a non-signature. This is not a sufficient reason >to release your own organization's signatures onto the internet when you can >or should know that they will fail validation.
Not to belabor the obvious, but the spec says what it says even if you personally wish it said something else. The way to make systems interoperate is to implement the actual spec. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
