----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Kitterman" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 4:17:57 PM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] the painful issue of SPF HELO > > On Friday, January 23, 2015 18:27:46 Anne Bennett wrote: > > I seem to have wandered into a bit of a minefield. :-/ > >
> > (end of rant) > > > > It's only fair to admit that despite my frustration, I'm > > grateful for all the work being done on these issues, both to > > combat spam, and to document what on earth is going on. > > I appreciate you sticking with it. It's good to get in depth review from new > sets of eyes. I certainly was sure I was sure I knew what the discussion > about SPF meant, but then I already knew what was intended, so it's good to > have someone else reviewing. +1 > > How about this: > > [SPF] can authenticate both the domain found in an [SMTP] HELO/EHLO > command (the HELO identity) and the domain found in an [SMTP] MAIL > command (the MAIL FROM identity). DMARC uses the result of SPF > authentication of the MAIL FROM identity. Section 2.4 of [SPF] describes > SPF MAIL FROM processing for cases in which the MAIL command has a > null path. > +1 Ship it! _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
