dmarc  

Messages by Date

• 2023/04/17 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Is From spoofing an interoperability issue or not? Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/17 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Is From spoofing an interoperability issue or not? Laura Atkins
• 2023/04/17 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Is From spoofing an interoperability issue or not? Laura Atkins
• 2023/04/17 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Is From spoofing an interoperability issue or not? Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/17 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Is From spoofing an interoperability issue or not? Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/17 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Is From spoofing an interoperability issue or not? Dotzero
• 2023/04/17 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/17 [dmarc-ietf] Is From spoofing an interoperability issue or not? Laura Atkins
• 2023/04/16 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/16 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
• 2023/04/16 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/16 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/16 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/16 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/16 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/16 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/16 [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Apr 16 06:00:04 2023 John Levine
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Give up on SPF alone Hector Santos
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Wei Chuang
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs John R Levine
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Jesse Thompson
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs John Levine
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs John Levine
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Give up on SPF alone Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Jesse Thompson
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Laura Atkins
• 2023/04/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Laura Atkins
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Dotzero
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Mark Alley
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Jesse Thompson
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Author vs Signer Domains Mark Alley
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Author vs Signer Domains Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/14 [dmarc-ietf] Author vs Signer Domains Hector Santos
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Dotzero
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Dotzero
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Dotzero
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows John Levine
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Dotzero
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Laura Atkins
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] General-purpose domains with users from the general public MUST NOT use p=reject Mark Alley
• 2023/04/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/14 [dmarc-ietf] General-purpose domains with users from the general public MUST NOT use p=reject Matthäus Wander
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Barry Leiba
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs John Levine
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs John R Levine
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Brotman, Alex
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Brotman, Alex
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? John R Levine
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Barry Leiba
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Dotzero
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Barry Leiba
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Dotzero
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Barry Leiba
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Dotzero
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Todd Herr
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs John R Levine
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Dotzero
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Mark Alley
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Barry Leiba
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Barry Leiba
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Barry Leiba
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs John Levine
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Todd Herr
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be) John R Levine
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be) Eric D. Williams
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Steven M Jones
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Todd Herr
• 2023/04/12 [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/12 [dmarc-ietf] Introducing DSAP/ATPS for Improved Email Authentication Hector Santos
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? John R Levine
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Dotzero
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Hector Santos
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Brotman, Alex
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? John R Levine
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expected Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Brotman, Alex
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Laura Atkins
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Laura Atkins
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expected Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expected Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/12 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expected Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern John Levine
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Mark Alley
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Emanuel Schorsch
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/10 [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DSAP "DKIM Sender Authorization Protocol" for DMARC Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] not really such a thing as AOL-compatible mailing lists Hector Santos
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] not really such a thing as AOL-compatible mailing lists Hector Santos
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] not really such a thing as AOL-compatible mailing lists Wei Chuang
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] not really such a thing as AOL-compatible mailing lists Wei Chuang
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Mark Alley
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] not really such a thing as AOL-compatible mailing lists Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] not really such a thing as AOL-compatible mailing lists John Levine
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be) John R Levine
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be) Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/04/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Matthäus Wander
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Wei Chuang
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Douglas Foster
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Hector Santos
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Barry Leiba
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Hector Santos
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Scott Kitterman
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows John Levine
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Jesse Thompson
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Matthäus Wander
• 2023/04/09 [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Apr 9 06:00:05 2023 John Levine
• 2023/04/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/04/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Mark Alley
• 2023/04/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows John Levine
• 2023/04/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Neil Anuskiewicz

• Later messages