On 1/9/21 1:33 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07 2021 at 10:24pm -0500,
> JeffleXu <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On 1/8/21 5:47 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 23 2020 at  6:26am -0500,
>>> Jeffle Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ->poll_fn is introduced in commit ea435e1b9392 ("block: add a poll_fn
>>>> callback to struct request_queue") for supporting non-mq queues such as
>>>> nvme multipath, but removed in commit 529262d56dbe ("block: remove
>>>> ->poll_fn").
>>>>
>>>> To add support of IO polling for non-mq device, this method need to be
>>>> back. Since commit c62b37d96b6e ("block: move ->make_request_fn to
>>>> struct block_device_operations") has moved all callbacks into struct
>>>> block_device_operations in gendisk, we also add the new method named
>>>> ->iopoll in block_device_operations.
>>>
>>> Please update patch subject and header to:
>>>
>>> block: add iopoll method to support bio-based IO polling
>>>
>>> ->poll_fn was introduced in commit ea435e1b9392 ("block: add a poll_fn
>>> callback to struct request_queue") to support bio-based queues such as
>>> nvme multipath, but was later removed in commit 529262d56dbe ("block:
>>> remove ->poll_fn").
>>>
>>> Given commit c62b37d96b6e ("block: move ->make_request_fn to struct
>>> block_device_operations") restore the possibility of bio-based IO
>>> polling support by adding an ->iopoll method to gendisk->fops.
>>> Elevate bulk of blk_mq_poll() implementation to blk_poll() and reduce
>>> blk_mq_poll() to blk-mq specific code that is called from blk_poll().
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>>  block/blk-core.c       | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  block/blk-mq.c         | 70 +++++--------------------------------
>>>>  include/linux/blk-mq.h |  3 ++
>>>>  include/linux/blkdev.h |  1 +
>>>>  4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>>>> index 96e5fcd7f071..2f5c51ce32e3 100644
>>>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>>>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>>>> @@ -1131,6 +1131,85 @@ blk_qc_t submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
>>>>  }
>>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(submit_bio);
>>>>  
>>>> +static bool blk_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie)
>>>> +{
>>>> +  struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>>>> +
>>>> +  /* TODO: bio-based device doesn't support hybrid poll. */
>>>> +  if (!queue_is_mq(q))
>>>> +          return false;
>>>> +
>>>> +  hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
>>>> +  if (blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
>>>> +          return true;
>>>> +
>>>> +  hctx->poll_considered++;
>>>> +  return false;
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> I don't see where you ever backfill bio-based hybrid support (in
>>> the following patches in this series, so it is lingering TODO).
>>
>> Yes the hybrid polling is not implemented and thus bypassed for
>> bio-based device currently.
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * blk_poll - poll for IO completions
>>>> + * @q:  the queue
>>>> + * @cookie: cookie passed back at IO submission time
>>>> + * @spin: whether to spin for completions
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Description:
>>>> + *    Poll for completions on the passed in queue. Returns number of
>>>> + *    completed entries found. If @spin is true, then blk_poll will 
>>>> continue
>>>> + *    looping until at least one completion is found, unless the task is
>>>> + *    otherwise marked running (or we need to reschedule).
>>>> + */
>>>> +int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
>>>> +{
>>>> +  long state;
>>>> +
>>>> +  if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) ||
>>>> +      !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
>>>> +          return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +  if (current->plug)
>>>> +          blk_flush_plug_list(current->plug, false);
>>>> +
>>>> +  /*
>>>> +   * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
>>>> +   * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
>>>> +   * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
>>>> +   * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
>>>> +   * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
>>>> +   * we also should not sleep.
>>>> +   */
>>>> +  if (spin && blk_poll_hybrid(q, cookie))
>>>> +          return 1;
>>>> +
>>>> +  state = current->state;
>>>> +  do {
>>>> +          int ret;
>>>> +          struct gendisk *disk = queue_to_disk(q);
>>>> +
>>>> +          if (disk->fops->iopoll)
>>>> +                  ret = disk->fops->iopoll(q, cookie);
>>>> +          else
>>>> +                  ret = blk_mq_poll(q, cookie);
>>
>> The original code is indeed buggy. For bio-based device, ->iopoll() may
>> not be implemented while QUEUE_FLAG_POLL flag is still set, in which
>> case blk_mq_poll() will be called for this bio-based device.
> 
> Yes, here is the patch I created to capture my suggestions.  Provided it
> looks good to you, please fold it into patch 3 when you rebase for
> posting a v2 of your patchset:

Thanks, I will merge it into the next version.


Thanks,
Jeffle

> 
> From: Mike Snitzer <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:45:17 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] fixup patch 3
> 
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c       | 51 
> +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  block/blk-mq.c         |  6 ++----
>  include/linux/blk-mq.h |  3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index e6671f6ce1a4..44f62dc0fa9f 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1212,22 +1212,6 @@ int blk_bio_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t 
> cookie)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_bio_poll);
>  
> -static bool blk_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie)
> -{
> -     struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> -
> -     /* TODO: bio-based device doesn't support hybrid poll. */
> -     if (!queue_is_mq(q))
> -             return false;
> -
> -     hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
> -     if (blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
> -             return true;
> -
> -     hctx->poll_considered++;
> -     return false;
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * blk_poll - poll for IO completions
>   * @q:  the queue
> @@ -1243,6 +1227,8 @@ static bool blk_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, 
> blk_qc_t cookie)
>  int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
>  {
>       long state;
> +     struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = NULL;
> +     struct gendisk *disk = NULL;
>  
>       if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) ||
>           !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
> @@ -1251,26 +1237,31 @@ int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t 
> cookie, bool spin)
>       if (current->plug)
>               blk_flush_plug_list(current->plug, false);
>  
> -     /*
> -      * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
> -      * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
> -      * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
> -      * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
> -      * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
> -      * we also should not sleep.
> -      */
> -     if (spin && blk_poll_hybrid(q, cookie))
> -             return 1;
> +     if (queue_is_mq(q)) {
> +             /*
> +              * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
> +              * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
> +              * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
> +              * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
> +              * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
> +              * we also should not sleep.
> +              */
> +             hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
> +             if (spin && blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
> +                     return 1;
> +             hctx->poll_considered++;
> +     } else
> +             disk = queue_to_disk(q);
>  
>       state = current->state;
>       do {
>               int ret;
> -             struct gendisk *disk = queue_to_disk(q);
>  
> -             if (disk->fops->iopoll)
> +             if (hctx)
> +                     ret = blk_mq_poll(q, hctx, cookie);
> +             else if (disk->fops->iopoll)
>                       ret = disk->fops->iopoll(q, cookie);
> -             else
> -                     ret = blk_mq_poll(q, cookie);
> +
>               if (ret > 0) {
>                       __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>                       return ret;
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index fcb44604f806..90d8dead1da5 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -3826,12 +3826,10 @@ bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
>       return blk_mq_poll_hybrid_sleep(q, rq);
>  }
>  
> -int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie)
> +int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q,
> +             struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie)
>  {
>       int ret;
> -     struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> -
> -     hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
>  
>       hctx->poll_invoked++;
>       ret = q->mq_ops->poll(hctx);
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> index 2f3742207df5..b95f2ffa866f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> @@ -607,7 +607,8 @@ static inline void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request *rq, 
> struct bio *bio,
>  }
>  
>  blk_qc_t blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio);
> -int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie);
> +int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q,
> +             struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie);
>  bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
>               struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie);
>  void blk_mq_hctx_set_fq_lock_class(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Jeffle

--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to